property tax, PropertyRadar

City of LA Squanders Property Tax Windfall for Years, Now Sues Banks

The city of Los Angeles recently filed lawsuits against Citigroup, Wells Fargo and Bank of America for unspecified damages for allegedly engaging in discriminatory lending practices in the city’s minority communities, leading to a wave of foreclosures and a decline in property tax revenues.

Among many other claims the lawsuit cites a report that Los Angeles homeowners lost $78.8 billion in home values as a direct result of foreclosures, and property tax revenue losses were $481 million.

Absurd. Government officials should not be able to cheerlead a bubble, benefit from the property tax windfall it creates, and then whine when it’s over with fiction vs. facts in a lawsuit.

First, lets get a simple fact straight. Foreclosures did NOT cause price declines. We had price declines because banks, with the full support of Congress and the Federal Reserve, created a massive housing bubble. That bubble burst simply because it was unsustainable. Foreclosures were the RESULT, not the CAUSE. And to those who claim there were billions in losses, I’d suggest a fair accounting would offset those losses with the ill-gotten gains received during the bubble. In most areas I think you’ll find that to be a wash.

The most ridiculous claim of course is that there were any losses in property taxes. Instead the housing bubble created a huge windfall from 2003 to 2008 that some cities and counties recklessly squandered. The chart below illustrates just how lucrative the housing bubble was for the City of Los Angeles, and how resilient it was to the decline in prices. If this chart indicates anything, it is that homeowners got screwed, not the city.

According to the Los Angeles City Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2012, property tax revenue soared nearly 120 percent, or approximately $900 million, from 2003 to 2009, peaking at $1.7 billion in 2009. Since 80 percent of the increase in total tax revenues over that time period came from property taxes, Los Angeles was particularly vulnerable to any slowdown in property tax revenue. From 2009 to 2012, after the bursting of the housing bubble, property tax revenues plateaued, settling at $1.66 billion in 2012, down approximately 2 percent from the 2009 peak.

 

property tax, PropertyRadar

 

Apparently, the city of Los Angeles assumed that property tax revenue would keep increasing at a rapid clip in perpetuity. From 2003 to 2009, the city of Los Angeles increased expenditures by nearly $3 billion. Despite the plateau in property tax revenues beginning in 2009, from 2009 to 2012 expenditures continued to rise by almost $450 million. In other words, government expenditures continued to increase faster than government revenue. See the problem here?

To make matters worse, many government officials are now calling for the end of Proposition 13. Imagine how many more homes would have been lost in California without Proposition 13 as their property taxes doubled or more from 2000 to 2008 thanks to the banks, government and the Federal Reserve colluding to inflate home prices – and property taxes. That isn’t to say there isn’t room for improvement. I do believe Prop 13 should be changed to cap annual increases at CPI rather than 2 percent so that governments do receive predictable increases that offset actual inflation.

It will be interesting to watch this lawsuit unfold, and to see if Los Angeles is able to use it to extort some money from the banks. If they do prevail, I hope they consider giving the proceeds back to the homeowners whose property taxes they squandered.

One Comment

  • property tax, PropertyRadarCeeG says:

    Here, here! Also follows what I’ve been critical of for several years now: the “poor, foreclosed homeowner” meme. Though the bank/servicers have shown an incredible amount of arrogance & massive incompetence, the other side of the coin is the many thousands of home “owners” have gotten away with YEARS of free (or skimmed) rent, squatting, stripping properties, stiffing HOAs, etc.

    I have personally witnessed hundreds of properties in my local area where no payment has been made for 2, 3, 4… up to 6 years I think is the record. And the “banks” simply will not foreclose. I’ve witnessed vacant properties (so no one’s deriving any discernible use or benefit from), no payment for 3 years, that the lender hasn’t even filed an NOD!

    So just like this city crying foul now that the circumstances don’t suit them, the same thing has played out, WRIT LARGE, in the whole “poor, foreclosed” homeowner arena with all the attendant bogus claims, lawsuits, stall tactics, and misdirected “bills of rights” for “homeowners”.

    Oh… and where this gets really interesting: any idea how many real estate “professionals” have lost properties to foreclosure, engaged in strategic default, REO listing agents squatting or pimping out foreclosed properties??? Or engaged in short sale “flopping” and other short sale fraud? And where is the (D)BRE on this?? Nowhere to be found, as usual. Seems to me any real estate licensee who has a foreclosure should have their license reviewed for fitness to keep said license. After all, a foreclosure (without being able to demonstrate good cause/bonafide hardship) is definitely “substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a real estate licensee” that the BRE is always on about. But once again, the BRE is nowhere to be found. And what homebuyer or seller would want to be represented by an agent who lost their own property(ies) to foreclosure??

X
X